Aquatic AQ-DM-4U Instrukcja Użytkownika Strona 22

  • Pobierz
  • Dodaj do moich podręczników
  • Drukuj
  • Strona
    / 50
  • Spis treści
  • BOOKMARKI
  • Oceniono. / 5. Na podstawie oceny klientów
Przeglądanie stron 21
-10-
PLAINTIFF AQUATIC AV, INC’S AM. DISCLOSURE OF ASSERTED CLAIMS AND INFRINGEMENT
CONTENTIONS / Case No. 3-14-cv-01931-WHA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
combination with remote controls AQ-IRR, AQ-RF-3, AQ-RF-34, AQ-RF-3HH,
AQ-RF-3FB, AQ-RFDM-2BX, AQ-RFDM-2, AQ-RFDM-4, AQ-RFDM-4U, AQ-
RFDM-4F, AQ-RFDM-5BT, AQ-RFDM 5UBT, and AQ-WR-3F
For claim 66: AQ-DM 3B, AQ-DM-4U, AQ-DM 4UBT, AQ-DM-5, AQ-DM 5BT,
AQ-DM 5UBT, and AQ-IP-3B.
For claim 67: AQ-DM-2BX, AQ-DM-4B, AQ-DM-4U, AQ-DM 4UBT, AQ-DM
5BT, AQ-DM 5UBT, and AQ-IP-3B, separately or in combination with remote
controls AQ-IRR, AQ-RF-3, AQ-RF-34, AQ-RF-3HH, AQ-RF-3FB, AQ-RFDM-
2BX, AQ-RFDM-2, AQ-RFDM-4, AQ-RFDM-4U, AQ-RFDM-4F, AQ-RFDM-
5BT, AQ-RFDM 5UBT, and AQ-WR-3F.
There may be future products developed by Aquatic that are covered by one or more of the asserted
claims of the asserted patents. Aquatic’s investigation of other apparatuses, products, devices,
processes, methods, acts, or other instrumentalities is ongoing, and Aquatic reserves its right to
supplement and/or amend this identification as its investigation proceeds.
VI. Patent Local Rules 3-1(h)
Based on the information currently available to it, Aquatic provides the following basis for
its allegation of willful infringement.
Magnadyne was aware of the ‘756 patent since at least January 2011, before it began
making, using, selling, offering for sale and/or importing the Accused Instrumentalities.
Magnadyne had actual notice that it was infringing the ‘756 patent at least as early as January 2011,
when it entered into its Master Purchase Agreement with SSV. In addition, on November 15, 2013,
Magnadyne received an infringement notice letter from Aquatic. On information and belief,
Magnadyne also had notice of its infringement of the ‘081 patent as of November 2013. At a
minimum, Magnadyne had actual notice of its infringement of the ‘081 patent since at least April
25, 2014. Nonetheless, Magnadyne continued its activities with respect to the Accused
Instrumentalities despite the objectively high likelihood that its actions constituted infringement of
the ‘756 and ‘081 patents.
Case3:14-cv-01931-WHA Document87-2 Filed02/03/15 Page11 of 13
Przeglądanie stron 21
1 2 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ... 49 50

Komentarze do niniejszej Instrukcji

Brak uwag